Chapter 10
Additional Topics
In the previous chapters we
talked about very many sensors and actuators of various types. The discussion
focused on the principles of operation and on some of the applications of these
sensors and actuators.
In this chapter we look at
some additional aspects of sensors, aspects that could not have been discussed
in conjunction with principles. First, we discuss a new class of sensors and
actuators called MEMs (Micro-Electro-Mechanical). MEMs
really relates to the method of production of sensors/actuators whereas the
sensors and actuators themselves may be almost any of the sensors/actuators
discussed previously. Then we tackle the issue of smart sensors that again
includes many methods and many types of sensors but in general, smart sensors
imply that additional electronics have been incorporated with the sensors. This
may mean, for example, that a processor, an amplifier or some other type of
circuitry has been incorporated with the sensor. Smart sensors are not always
very ÒsmartÓ in the sense of what they can do but are a step above regular
active or passive sensors. Sometimes a smart sensor is a true necessity and
evolved from the need to solve a problem. For example, a sensor may need to be
very close to the processing circuit. It is then not a far stretch to bring the
processor to the sensor and package them together. In other cases, the
production method, especially with silicon based sensors, happens to be the
same and therefore it is only natural that the two are combined. A third topic
to be discussed is the issue of wireless. Although a sensor cannot be
ÒwirelessÓ the term wireless sensors is commonly used for sensors who
communicate with the outside world through a wireless link. This approach is
becoming more common and hence we will discuss not only issues associated with
sensors but also wireless issues including frequencies, methods of modulation
and issues of antennas and coverage including range. The final topic in this
chapter is sensor arrays. We have already discussed sensor arrays, especially
optical arrays. The meaning here is different. Whereas an optical sensor array
was a sensor made of a number of individual sensors put together to perform a
function (usually imaging), sensor arrays here will mean an array of sensor,
spatially separated where each sensor performs its function and sends the data
to a central location for processing. Thus, the main distinction is in the
spatial distribution of the arrays.
Here we will take a much
narrower view, primarily for the purpose of narrowing down the subject and to
avoid overlap with previously discussed material such as that in chapter 6, 7
and to a lesser extent in chapter 5 where various sensors such as semiconductor
based pressure sensors as well as accelerometers and others, which are usually
micromachined sensors were discussed. To do so we will concentrate here
strictly on those sensors and actuators which employ moving members in the true
sense including micromotors, micropositioners, grippers and the like (all are
actuators) and other devices which employ these elements for sensing purposes.
However, before we do so, it
is well worth discussing some topics in micromachining as well as basic
techniques in semiconductor processing since these methods are at the base of
all MEMs. A few of the methods used for construction of MEMs are:

Fig. 10.1. Basic steps in
patterning.

Fig. 10.2. Methods of
etching.

Fig. 10.3. Methods of
plasma etching
a.
b.
Fig. 10.4. a. The
epitaxial and b. LPCVD deposition
systems
The processes described above
are common integrated circuit techniques and for the basis of semiconductors
production. However, for MEMs productions additional techniques are needed.
These are temed micromachining techniques. Many of these are methods that allow
construction of structural members of the MEM. Some of the most common
micromachining methods are as follows:

Fig. 10.5. Deep etching of
a membrane

Fig.
10.6. Basic surface micromachining process (cross-sectional (i) and lateral
(ii) views)
There are many variations of
these methods and combination of methods that allow fabrication of very fine
structure of various depths and thicknesses but as a rule, these are based on
the methods described above or combinations thereof.
In addition to fabrication
methods borrowed from silicon processing, there are so-called non-silicon
technologies. Some of these such as LIGA and EPON are capable of producing very
slender, high aspect ratio structures such as cogs and wheels at a scale that
is typically larger than common semiconductor scales (a few mm). Figure
10.7a shows a LIGA sacrificial
process and Figure 10.7b shows a
product fabricated using the EPON process.


a. b.
Fig. 10.7. a. The LIGA
sacrificial process. B. Product made using the EPON process.
The devices produces using
any or all of these methods are often integrated with semiconductor circuits to
produce sensors/actuators. An example may be a pressure sensor produced using
bulk micromachining followed (or preceded) by production of semiconductor
strain gauges and/or amplifiers or other processing elements.
MEMs Actuators
As mentioned above. MEMs for
the purpose of this chapter are those that contain physically moving members
beyong the simple flexing of a beam or a membrane. In terms of actuators, this
means that we are dealing with micro-motors of various types as well as other
devices such as micro-grippers, escape mechanisms and the like.
In the very early days of
development of MEMs, a variety of very interesting devices were built,
including rotating motors based on electrostatic attraction/repulsion. These
ÒmotorsÓ while perfectly valid as mechanisms were used to demonstrate the
technology. They can only produce minuscule forces and torques (although they
can rotate very fast) and therefore are not likely to replace any existing
actuation technologies but they may find limited applications in miniature
robots. Nevertheless, MEMs have found use in some very important actuation
applications. Some of these are as follows:
Micromotors
A variety of micromotors have
been produced using various fabrication techniques, some of them having
diameters of a few hundred micrometers. These motors are electrostatic in
nature, that is, the forces are attraction forces between stator plates and rotor
plates as shown in Figure 10.8. By
properly modulating the voltages on the plates, induced charges on the rotors
affect the forces and the motion. Typical construction is in two polysilicon
layers and produced in a few steps over a substrate as shown in Figure 10.9.

Fig. 10.8. An
electrostatic micromotor.

Fig. 10.9. Typical
construction of micromotors
The same methods are used for
other types of structure such as the micro-locking system shown in Figure
10.10. Here use is being made of
wheels produced as for rotating motors but with limited motion and with
latching mechanisms which can be actuated using electrostatic forces or by
other means (magnetic, bi-metal, heating, etc.).

Fig. 10.10. A
micro-locking system.
Resonator and comb drives
Another successful method of
mechanically driving mechanism is the comb structure shown in Figure 10.11. Here, each side of the structure is a comb like
capacitor. The comb structure increases the capacitance and the
attraction/repulsion of the central movable structure is responsible for the
motion. The central structure is anchored. The structure can be moved slowly or
it can be made to resonate mechanically. This idea has been applied to a number
of devices including gyroscopes and to drive rotors through escape mechanisms.

Fig. 10.11. A comb
resonator. Note the anchors that provide restoring forces.
Micro-pumps
Another interesting
application is shown in Figure 10.12.
Here a microchannel is built in silicon together with two valves. A method of
expanding the diaphragm must be provided. This can be electrostatic or
piezoelectric, or, as shown, it may be thermal using a heater to heat a gas or
fluid in a closed chamber which, upon expansion generates a pressure
differential. The fluid is expelled through the sealing outlet valve. In the
cooling process, the fluid is sucked into the pumping chamber. Clearly this is
not a high power device but it may be used for medicine delivery systems and
for low volume metering applications.

Fig. 10.12. A micropump actuated
by heat. Note the two valves.
Deformable mirrors
In light modulation for
displays and projectors, it is often sufficient to deform a mirror or rotate it
a minute angle to affect significant changes in reflection of light. In these
applications mechanical force is minimal and therefore it is a good candidate
for implementation in MEMs. An example is shown in Figure 10.13. Here the forces are electrostatic. The deformation can
be as in Figure 10.14 in which an
aluminum coating forms the reflection surface. Another method, adopted in TIs
projection system is shown in Figure 10.15. This particular device has been implemented into a full 3D projection
system in which each color is projected separately (Figure 10.16).

Fig. 10.13. Electrostatic
forces used to deform the surface of a mirror. The mirror is usually an
aluminum deposition layer.

Fig. 10.14. Another method
of deforming a mirror.

Figure 10.15. Tilting
mirror activated by electrostatic forces and used in a projection system as an
array of mirrors.

Fig. 10.16. TIÕs
projection system using deformable mirrors. Each chip is an array of mirrors.
Microtips and
manipulators.
The methods used for
production of MEMs have yielded some interesting and useful devices. One of
them is a microtip, produced by lithographic techniques. One of these, shown in
Figure 10.17. These microtips have
been used for sensors and in scanning electron microscopes for manipulation on
very small scales, including manipulation of individual atoms because of their
very sharp tip.

Fig. 10.17. A very fine
microtip used for micro-manipulation.
Another is the microgripper
shown in Figure 10.18. These
devices are envisioned for use in microassembly and microrobots, including
possible applications in remote work with hazardous substances and in medicine.

Fig. 10.18. An
electrostatic microgripper. Note the scale.
Microconveyor belt. Here the idea is that although any MEM is very small
and cannot develop any significant force, an array of these devices can
generate large forces and hence produce useful work. An example is the
microconveyor belt shown in Figure 10.19. The operation is simple: the upper part and the lower part of the belt
are separated by movable segments which can tilt, affecting rotation, and hence
linear translation in either direction as shown in Figure 10.20.

Fig. 10.19. Photograph of
a microconveyor belt

Fig. 10.20. Operation of
the microconveyor belt showing the lifting and rotation motion of the actuators
against the fixed (lower) and movable (upper) layers.
2. Smart sensors/actuators
A smart sensor or actuator is
any sensor/actuator in which some level of ÒintelligenceÓ has been introduced.
This simply means that in addition to the normal function of the device,
circuitry has been added to take on such functions of local data processing
and, sometimes, even decision making. That also means that additional power for
the electronic circuits must be available for the purpose. For example, a
microprocessor may be added to the sensor/actuator to analyze the data, perhaps
to digitize the output from the sensor, to compensate for unwanted stimuli and,
of course, to communicate to the main processor to which the sensor is
ultimately connected. The level of intelligence, or how ÒsmartÓ the sensor is
may vary from the trivial to the truly complex. At the lower end, this may
include such simple circuits as current and voltage limiters, active filters
and compensation circuits. In the high end of the spectrum, all functions of
processing, including digitization, data transmission (wire or wireless), data
logging and any conceivable function may be included on board making the sensor
a free standing sensing system. In actuators, protection circuits such as
thermal protection, overvoltage and overcurrent protection as well as motion
and limit functions may be added. Other options are counters, alarms, data
loggers and many others. Integration of electronics with sensors, particularly
silicon based sensors is always possible but it is based on the commercial
viability of the sensor. Sometimes, this integration makes perfect sense,
especially when they are used for mass market application (the automobile
industry, toys, for example). In other cases it is better to leave the sensor
as a general purpose sensor and allow the designer to integrate it in the
design as necessary.
Figure 10.21 shows a basic smart sensor and its connection to a
controller through a 4-20 mA loop (to be discussed in the following chapter).
To be noted are the microprocessor and, in this case, a separate Analog to
Digital Converter (ADC – also to be discussed in the following chapter).
While the exact configuration and needs will vary from one sensor to the other,
this configuration is representative of the type of devices one can expect to
find in a smart sensor.

Fig. 10.21. A smart sensor
fed by a 4-20 mA loop. The loop also transfers the data to the controller. The
data given are for specific components from a manufacturer.
3. Wireless Sensors and Issues Associated with
Wireless Sensors
Sensors, of course are not,
by themselves, wireless. The term wireless sensor refers more to the link with
the sensor than with the sensor itself. In most cases, a communication link is
made available to send data out and, sometimes, to receive data. This of course
means that the sensor must, by necessity be a smart sensors since most sensors
do not produce data that can be sent directly over a wireless link. For
example, a thermocouple produces a dc signal (or a slowly varying signal). This
signal must first be digitized and then used to modulate a carrier before it
can be transmitter. On the other end, at the processor, the opposite process
must take place. Some sensors are truly digital and produce, for example, a
signal whose frequency is proportional to the stimulus. These are usually
easier to interface with wireless systems. All this is fairly obvious and
represents essentially replacement of the physical link with a wireless link.
However, it also means that remote sensing in the true sense can now take place.
The sensor (or, for that matter an actuator or both), may be far from the
processor, perhaps on a different continent, in space or on a different planet.
The communication link itself may be a short range link or may use microwave
communication links, wireless communication systems or satellites, depending on
the need.
Many sensing systems make use
of short range wireless communication, often in a dedicated link. These
typically use one of the ISM (Industrial, Scientific and Medical) bands
allocated by the FCC (or by the ISO (International Standards Organization) in
Europe and other countries. These frequencies are allocated for general use and
unregulated (except for frequencies and power allowed). These are used by very
many applications such as remote control (garage door openers, keyless entry in
vehicles and buildings), for hobby and for data transfer. Operation in these
bands is strictly enforces as to frequency, bandwidth and transmitted power
allowed. This also means that the range is short – typically less than
100 m, often much less. Nevertheless this range is often sufficient for remote
sensing within a building, around the factory floor and the like. In many
cases, the necessary range is so small that even an induction link is
sufficient but, nevertheless, this is a wireless link.
The ISM and SRD bands
In the United States, the
Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is responsible for allocation of
frequencies for general use by industry and the public. In Europe and many
other countries, the European Telecommunications Standards Institute, (ETSI),
the European Radiocommunication Office (ERO) and the CISPR Comission of the
International Telecommunication Organization (ITO) regulate the use of
frequencies. The allocations in the US (and Canada) and those in Europe and
other countries are not the same but, at least in part overlap.
The ISM (Industrial,
Scientific and Medical) band was originally allocated to be used in industry
for such things as microwave ovens, dielectric welders and the like as well as
in medical applications including microwave treatment of tumors. These
frequencies are shown in Table 1.
The low frequencies are commonly used in industrial microwave heating, welding
and cooking but also in RFID tagging and short range communication.. Other
frequencies, such as the 2.45 GHz band are used in consumer products such as
microwave ovens. The 915 MHz band is universally used for communication and
control as well as for RFID applications and many more. Some of the allocated
frequencies have no current use but have been incorporated for future use.
Table 1. ISM allocations,
uses and allowable power.
|
Frequency |
Some typical Applications |
Power/field strength |
|
124 - 135 kHz |
low frequency, inductive
coupling, RFIDs, tire pressure sensing |
72 dBmA/m |
|
6.765 - 6.795 MHz |
inductive coupling, RFIDs |
42 dBµA/m |
|
7.400 - 8.800 MHz |
Article surveillance |
9 dBµA/m |
|
13.553 - 13.567 MHz |
inductive coupling,
contactless smartcards, smartlabels, item management, dielectric welding,
short range communication |
42 dBµA/m |
|
26.957 - 27.283 MHz |
Industrial microwave ovens,
dielectric welding |
42 dBµA/m |
|
40.660 - 40.700 MHz |
Industrial microwave ovens,
dielectric welding |
42 dBµA/m |
|
33.050-434.79 |
Remote entry, wireless
controll |
10 – 100 mW |
|
2.400 - 2.483 GHz |
Remote control, vehicle
identification, microwave ovens, LANs, Bluetooth, WLAN, ZigBee, cordless
telephones |
4 W - spread spectrum,
USA/Canada only, 500 mW, Europe |
|
5.725 - 5.875 GHz |
Wireless video cameras for
security, wireless communication, control, WiMAX, future use |
4 W USA/Canada, 500
mW Europe |
|
24.000 – 24.25 GHz |
To be used in the future |
4 W USA/Canada, 500
mW Europe |
Notes:
1. The last three bands are
divided into channels each 0.5 MHz in bandwidth.
2. The power/field values are
for communication applications. In microwave ovens the power is much higher
since the system is enclosed.
The SRD (Short Range Devices)
have been allocated for what is often called ÒunregulatedÓ use. Unregulated is
a misnomer because they are actually very tightly regulated but they are
available for use without special licenses by any product, as long as they
conform to the provisions of the regulation in terms of frequency, bandwidth,
power, and often, duty cycle. The SRD frequencies are shown in Table 2. Of these, the only truly internationally accepted
frequency is the 433 MHz. This is almost universally used for short range
control (keyless entry system, garage door openers). In the US, other bands
have been used in the past for this purpose (290 MHz, 310, 315 and 418 MHz) but
the tendency is to conform more and more with international allocations. The
higher bands (860 MHz to 928 MHz) are still separate and there does not seem to
be any convergence to common bands.
It should be noted that each
frequency band comes with its own constraints. For example, the higher
frequencies (860 MHz and higher) usually incorporate bands. One can operate
within one band or hop between them but cannot use a bandwidth that spans two
bands. In the 433 MHz range, the bandwidth is fixed, there are no bands (i.e. a
single band), power is constrained to 10 mW or up to 100 mW under special
license and the duty cycle is larger than 10%. That is, one is allowed to
transmit for up to 1 sec at a time with a minimum of 10 seconds between
transmissions.
Table 2. SRD allocations,
uses and allowable power.
|
Frequency |
Some applications |
Power |
|
|
433.050-434.79
MHz |
See Table 1 |
10 mW |
|
|
863.0-870.0
MHz |
Various, including
wireless audio, alarms, RFIDs, cell phones |
5 – 500 mW depending
on band |
|
|
902.5 - 928
MHz |
Same as above |
4 W - spread
spectrum, USA/Canada only |
|
Sensors and actuators often
operate in the ranges mentioned above either as separate systems or in
conjunction with other systems. For example, RFID systems are being used
extensively for identification and tagging of items ranging from consumer
products to pets. In that capacity they identify the item and contribute to
efficient distribution and tracking of products. However, they are also very
important in sensing. For example, many cars currently employ a key identification
system whereby only the key that has been properly programmed can be used. The
system employs an RFID in the key and a transceiver in the car dashboard or
steering columns senses the presence and identifies the key. What is unique
here is the very short range (usually below 1 m) and the wireless communication
at low frequencies (typically 13 MHz). Other RFIDs employ a true sensor. For
example, Microchip produces an RFID with a sensor input to allow temperature
sensors to monitor perishable products such as meat on their way to market. As
said above, there is nothing particularly ingenious in incorporating sensors in
wireless systems once the special needs of signal processing imposed by the
wireless system have been taken care of.
4. Sensor networks
Our discussion so far
concentrated on sensors and actuators operating independently or, in some
cases, multiple sensors being connected to affect a larger output
(thermocouples, for example). However, there are systems which are much more
complex than these and require a number of sensors (sometimes a large number)
in a distributed configuration. These may be used to sense a distributed
stimulus, sometimes over a very large area. The output of these sensors can
then be used to take decisions or to operate appropriate actuators to affect a
required function. For example, a series of sensors may be used to monitor the
watershed of a river and, perhaps automatically open spill gates on dams to
avoid flooding and to prevent damage. Other applications are in sensing
hazardous materials, traffic sensing and control, wireless security networks in
public areas and many others.
In a system of this type, the
network is fairly simple. Each sensor performs its sensing function and
transmits the data to a processor by an appropriate communication link,
including wireless. A system of this type is used in the US and Canada to
monitor lightning strikes, nationally. The system employs detectors which
detect the radio waves transmitted by the lightning strike. By using directive
antennas the direction of the lightning strike relative to the sensor is
identified. The distance to the lightning strike is found from the amplitude of
the signal received at the sensor. By incorporating a system of sensors
throughout the US and sending the signals back to a central location, a map of
lightning strikes is obtained and used in weather prediction (see www.strikestarus.com). Figure 10.22 shows the sensor system and some data it can provide.
Sensor networks for detecting and predicting thunderstorms are also in place.
The sensors in these systems are obviously smart sensors in the true sense.

Fig. 10.22. A
map of the US and Canada showing locations of lightning sensors and various
data that can be obtained from this sensor network
However, sensor networks can
be much more complicated than the ones described so far. In particular, in
conjunction with low power wireless applications, there is a whole methodology
of incorporating sensors and methods of communication so that each sensor can
only communicate to a few of its neighbors, perhaps only the nearest neighbors.
In large systems, it then becomes necessary to process data locally on each
sensor and only communicate the absolute necessary data. The reason for this is
that normally, processing of data is fast and predictable whereas communication
is slow and prone to interference and loss of data.